What is it about?

The average occupancy achieved in a maternity unit is driven by the size (number of births), and larger units have higher average occupancy and hence lower costs. This behavior is described by Poisson statistics and queuing theory. The HRG tariff used to pay hospitals in England does not take size into effect, hence, smaller units get penalized.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Smaller maternity units can lower their costs by flexing staff numbers to match arriving deliveries. This requires access to a pool of on-call midwives. The alternative is to merge two smaller units to form a larger one which gains lower costs due to economy of scale. This option is more difficult for remote and rural locations. However, reducing length of stay does not make much of an impact on costs since the majority of costs are associated with the delivery. Other papers in this series have demonstrated that declining LOS has contributed to a marked rise in neonatal (re)admissions for common conditions normally dealt with while the mother is still in the maternity unit.

Perspectives

The occupancy margin is essential to ensure that a bed is available for the next arriving patient. Part of a longer series investigating optimum bed numbers in hospitals, see http://www.hcaf.biz/2010/Publications_Full.pdf

Dr Rodney P Jones
Healthcare Analysis & Forecasting

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: A guide to maternity costs—why smaller units have higher costs, British Journal of Midwifery, January 2013, Mark Allen Group,
DOI: 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.1.54.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page