What is it about?

This corpus-based study explores the effects of relay interpreting at meetings of the United Nations General Assembly by comparing features of disfluency between the outputs of relay and non-relay simultaneous interpreting (SI).

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Findings suggest that relay interpreting may affect the output of relay takers from multiple perspectives. This corpus-based study of authentic data on disfluencies in relay and non-relay SI output helps to substantiate the findings of previous research on relay interpreting and disfluency in interpreting.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Disfluency in relay and non-relay simultaneous interpreting, FORUM Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation, July 2019, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/forum.18016.che.
You can read the full text:



The following have contributed to this page