What’s in a Name? Equal Treatment, Union Citizens and National Rules on Names and Titles

Ágoston Mohay, Norbert Tóth
  • ICL Journal, December 2017, De Gruyter
  • DOI: 10.1515/icl-2017-0075

EU Equal Treatment and Free Movement Law versus National Rules on Names and Titles

What is it about?

The construction of names and the use of nobility titles is not regulated by European Union law. Yet the Court of Justice of the EU has had to deal with such issues on various occasions where national rules on names or titles had to be contrasted with the EU law on equal treatment,Union citizenship and free movement and residence. Rules on names fall essentially within the competence of the member states, but the states have to regard EU law when exercising this competence. Our paper undertakes to analyse this issue in light of a recent relevant judgment, the Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff case.

Why is it important?

In the paper we argue inter alia that the Court of Justice of the EU decided in this judgment not to favour the rights of a free-moving EU citizen (even if the judgment admittedly affects only a limited circle of individuals) and put national constitutional identity first, yet the way in which the national identity clause was used by the Court is also debatable in our view.

Read Publication

http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/icl-2017-0075

The following have contributed to this page: Ágoston Mohay

In partnership with: