What is it about?
(Full, open access version of the paper available under “Resources” on the right.) Trans youth are often asked to delay their transition on account that we need to be certain that they're really trans. If our view is that we should promote gender exploration and avoid the narrowing of future possibilities, this delay isn't justified. Gender exploration occurs during transition rather than just before, and taking step towards transitioning can help youth better explore their gender. Furthermore, transition doesn't narrow future possibilities in the way that many authors presume, and in many cases it is delaying transition that narrows future possibilities most.
Photo by Sharon McCutcheon on Unsplash
Why is it important?
A lot of the literature on trans youth has been focused on how to predict their futures. This paper instead shows what it may look like to think about transition outside of the question of prediction. This gives us a completely new lens on social transition and puberty blockers, because we instead think about them tangibly in terms of their effects and how they open up or narrow possibilities. When we do that, it appears that it is more neutral to allow rather than to deny social transition and puberty blockers, and that they should be treated as the default rather than the exception that requires additional justification.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Thinking an ethics of gender exploration: Against delaying transition for transgender and gender creative youth, Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, April 2019, SAGE Publications, DOI: 10.1177/1359104519836462.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page