What is it about?
This paper surveys research on Document Image Quality Assessment (DIQA). We first provide a detailed analysis of both subjective and objective DIQA methods. Subjective methods, including ratings and pair-wise comparison-based approaches, are based on human opinions. Objective methods are based on quantitative measurements, including document modeling and human perception-based methods. Second, we summarize the types and sources of document degradations and techniques used to model degradations. In addition, we thoroughly review two standard measures to characterize document image quality: Optical Character Recognition (OCR)-based and objective human perception-based. Finally, we outline open challenges regarding developing DIQA methods and provide insightful discussion and future research directions for this problem. This survey will become an essential resource for the document analysis research community and serve as a basis for future research.
Featured Image
Photo by Debby Hudson on Unsplash
Why is it important?
It provides a detailed analysis of the development of technology in document image quality assessment research. It further provides future research directions to researchers.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Document Image Quality Assessment: A Survey, ACM Computing Surveys, June 2023, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery),
DOI: 10.1145/3606692.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page