What is it about?

The article argues that Christian fundamentalist women are oppressed, even when they have for religious reasons voluntarily chosen their subjugation under men. The article disagrees with the claim that Christian fundamentalism prevides women with adequate means for subersive power. instead the article proposes that women within Christian fundamentalism are oppressed, because within Christian fundamentalism the very identity of "woman" is construed as subjected, thus obliterating the possibility of choosing a non-subjected identity.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Religious fundamentalism is growing around the world and it is sometimes claimed that the role of women within fundamentalism, as subjugated to men, can be good and empowering for the women volontarily involved. This approach makes invisible the kind of oppression that still exists for these women, which is that within their religious belief-system they cannot simultaniously be women and not subjugated to men.

Perspectives

Oppression of all kinds are wrong, and it is especially devious if you within your belief-system are conceptualised in such a way that you have no choice.

Dr Erica Appelros
Lunds university, Centre for Theology and Religious Studies

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Gender within Christian fundamentalism – a philosophical analysis of conceptual oppression, International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, October 2014, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2015.1036906.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page