What is it about?
This paper investigates the causes of procedural deviations among seafarers despite existing regulations and safety management systems aimed at ensuring safety in maritime operations. It identifies "doubts related to work procedures" as a significant yet often overlooked factor influencing why seafarers do not adhere to prescribed protocols. The study employs a qualitative research approach based on Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. The findings are organised around four main themes that contribute to procedural non-compliance: Negative attitudes toward procedures. Lack of proper training. Poorly prepared procedures. Dynamic nature of maritime operations . The research highlights that these deviations arise from the difficulties seafarers face in balancing complex tasks with rigid procedural frameworks. It emphasises that the mismatch between institutional expectations and the realities of maritime work can breed mistrust in procedures, leading to either circumvention or only superficial compliance.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This study reframes procedural deviations as systemic failures (not individual faults), advocating for holistic safety reforms in maritime operations.
Perspectives
This study calls for more context-sensitive training, collaborative design of procedures, and adaptive safety management strategies that take into account the actual experiences of seafarers. It aims to provide a deeper understanding of maritime safety by shifting the focus from blaming "human error" to uncovering broader systemic and sociocultural influences on procedural non-compliance.
Dr G. Reza Emad
University of Tasmania
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Are ‘doubts related to work procedures’ the enigma behind accidents? – a sociocultural perspective from the maritime industry, Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, April 2025, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/18366503.2025.2488088.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
