What is it about?

The study presents a method for integration of scientific data and local knowledge to identify and prioritise community vulnerabilities to climate change, and to develop adaptation strategies that address these key vulnerabilities. A case study of a community in Northern Thailand tests the method and presents preliminary results from following the process.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The study found that there were distinct differences between the way community members and scientists view and talk about climate change and its effects on livelihoods. The community was first and foremost interested in relatively short-term periods of heat stress and irregular rainfall patterns that immediately affect key livelihood activities such as livestock and crop productivity; while the science-based analysis focused on longer-term changes in average temperature and rainfall patterns and the relevance of such changes to larger system shifts. Both viewpoints are of critical importance in developing adaptation plans that address immediate needs while keeping an eye on the trajectory of future changes. Through the merging of the two perspectives, a more holistic understanding of community vulnerability was developed, which provided the basis for designing relevant adaptation strategies.

Perspectives

This study does not advocate for using science over community knowledge or vice-versa, rather we examine how best to maximise the benefits of incorporating both viewpoints into adaptation planning. The goal is to help communities most effectively address the challenges associated with climate change.

Shelley Gustafson

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Adaptation planning in the Lower Mekong Basin: merging scientific data with local perspective to improve community resilience to climate change, Climate and Development, September 2016, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2016.1223593.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page