What is it about?

Students in the blended courses had a greater belief that prelecture videos could replace face-to-face (F2F) classes than did students in the F2F classes. Students in the blended courses showed a greater understanding of the flipped lecture format and performed better than students in the F2F classes. Students in the blended courses also tended to rate the instructor’s teaching effectiveness lower than students in the F2F classes.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Students' learning effectiveness in blended courses is different from students' learning effectiveness in F2F courses. The role of instructors in students’ learning experience for blended class has shifted away from an instructor-centered learning modality.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Blended versus face-to-face: Evidence from a graduate corporate finance class, Journal of Education for Business, March 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/08832323.2017.1299082.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page