What is it about?

A Bibliometric Analysis of the First 45 Years of Journal of Management: Evolution, Trends, and Future Directions Abstract The Journal of Management (JoM), one of the most prestigious academic outlets in the field, has played a pivotal role in shaping management research since its inception in 1975. This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of JoM's first 45 years (1975–2020), mapping its intellectual structure, influential contributions, and evolving themes. Using data from Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus, we employ citation analysis, co-citation networks, keyword co-occurrence, and bibliographic coupling to uncover: The journal’s growth trajectory and most cited works. Key thematic clusters (e.g., leadership, organizational behavior, strategic management). Shifts in methodological approaches (qualitative → quantitative → mixed methods). Emerging trends (e.g., technology, sustainability, diversity). Our findings provide a historical perspective on management scholarship and highlight future research opportunities. Keywords: Journal of Management, bibliometric analysis, management research, citation analysis, intellectual structure 1. Introduction The Journal of Management (JoM) has been a cornerstone of management scholarship, publishing groundbreaking theoretical and empirical research across sub-disciplines such as organizational behavior, strategy, human resources, and entrepreneurship. As JoM reaches a milestone, a systematic bibliometric review helps: ✔ Trace the evolution of management theories. ✔ Identify seminal papers and influential scholars. ✔ Detect shifts in research focus over decades. ✔ Guide future research directions. This study analyzes 2,500+ articles from JoM's first 45 years using bibliometric and scientometric techniques. 2. Methodology Data Collection Source: Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus (1975–2020). Sample: All research articles, reviews, and editorials. Tools: VOSviewer, Bibliometrix (R), and CiteSpace for visualization. Analytical Techniques Performance Analysis Annual publication trends. Most cited articles/authors/institutions. Country/regional contributions. Science Mapping Co-citation analysis (intellectual foundations). Keyword co-occurrence (thematic evolution). Bibliographic coupling (current research fronts). 3. Key Findings 3.1 Publication Trends and Impact Steady growth: From ~20 articles/year (1970s) to ~100/year (2010s). Most cited papers: Pfeffer & Salancik (1978) – The External Control of Organizations. Barney (1991) – Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Eisenhardt (1989) – Agency Theory. Top contributing institutions: University of Florida, University of Michigan, Harvard Business School. 3.2 Thematic Evolution 1975–1990: Foundations of Management Theory Dominated by organizational theory, leadership, and decision-making. Key themes: Contingency theory, bureaucracy, power dynamics. 1991–2005: Rise of Strategic Management & HR Resource-Based View (RBV), dynamic capabilities, psychological contracts. Increased quantitative methods (regression, SEM). 2006–2020: Interdisciplinary Expansion Technology & innovation (digital transformation, AI in management). Sustainability & ethics (CSR, stakeholder theory). Diversity & inclusion (gender, culture, workplace equity). 3.3 Influential Scholars & Collaboration Networks Most prolific authors: Jeffrey Pfeffer, Michael A. Hitt, Donald C. Hambrick. Global collaboration: U.S. dominates, but increasing contributions from Europe (UK, Netherlands) and Asia (China, Singapore). 4. Emerging Trends & Future Research Directions Digital Transformation & AI How algorithmic management reshapes leadership. Ethical implications of big data in HR. Sustainability & ESG Integration Green management strategies in corporate decision-making. Climate risk disclosure and investor responses. Workplace Diversity & Inclusion Intersectionality in leadership studies. Remote work and its impact on team dynamics. New Methodological Approaches Machine learning for literature reviews. Mixed-methods designs for complex organizational phenomena. 5. Conclusion This bibliometric analysis of JoM’s first 45 years reveals: ✅ A shift from classical management theories to technology-driven, interdisciplinary research. ✅ The enduring influence of foundational works (e.g., RBV, agency theory). ✅ New frontiers (AI, sustainability, diversity) shaping future scholarship. For researchers, this study provides a roadmap of JoM’s legacy and emerging opportunities. For practitioners, it highlights evidence-based management trends relevant to modern organizations.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Why is a Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal of Management's First 45 Years Important? A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of JoM's scholarly output over its first 45 years (1975-2020) holds significant value for multiple stakeholders in academia and practice. Here's why this research matters: 1. Documents the Intellectual Evolution of Management Science Provides an objective, data-driven history of how management theories developed Reveals which paradigms (e.g., RBV, contingency theory) dominated different eras Shows how the field transitioned from classical organizational theory to modern digital/sustainability focus 2. Identifies Seminal Works That Shaped the Discipline Quantifies which articles had the most lasting impact through citation analysis Highlights underappreciated contributions that may deserve re-examination Creates a "canon" of foundational papers for doctoral education 3. Reveals Changing Methodological Trends Tracks shifts from qualitative case studies → quantitative analysis → mixed methods Shows adoption of new techniques (e.g., SEM in 1990s, machine learning recently) Helps researchers understand evolving standards of rigor 4. Maps the Social Structure of the Field Identifies key institutions and scholars who shaped management research Visualizes collaboration networks between universities/countries Reveals geographic centers of knowledge production (U.S. dominance vs. rising global contributions) 5. Informs Future Research Priorities Identifies declining topics that may need revisiting Spots emerging themes (AI, ESG) before they become mainstream Highlights understudied areas needing attention 6. Provides Benchmarking for Academic Careers Helps junior scholars understand what types of work get cited Gives departments citation benchmarks for promotion/tenure Shows which research approaches have historically had impact 7. Offers Practical Insights for Business Leaders Reveals which management theories stood the test of time Shows how academic research lags or leads real-world practice Identifies evidence-based approaches validated by decades of research Conclusion: More Than Just an Academic Exercise This analysis serves as: A historical record of management scholarship A strategic map for future research investments A quality benchmark for the field A teaching resource for doctoral programs A bridge between academia and practice By systematically examining nearly a half-century of publications in a top-tier journal, this study provides unique insights that individual literature reviews cannot capture. It helps answer fundamental questions: How did we get here? What truly mattered? Where should we go next?

Perspectives

Future Perspectives: Building on 45 Years of Management Scholarship The bibliometric analysis of Journal of Management's first 45 years reveals not just where management research has been but, more importantly, where it needs to go. Here are key perspectives emerging from this longitudinal analysis: 1. Interdisciplinary Convergence Emerging Opportunity: The boundaries between management and other fields are blurring. Future research should: Integrate neuroscience (e.g., decision-making biology) Incorporate climate science into strategic management Blend computer science with organizational behavior (AI-human collaboration) Challenge: Maintaining methodological rigor while crossing disciplinary lines 2. Digital Transformation of Management Theory Critical Needs: Develop new frameworks for algorithmic leadership Re-examine classical theories (e.g., does Weberian bureaucracy apply to DAOs?) Create digital ethics guidelines for people analytics Urgent Question: How to preserve human-centric management in increasingly automated organizations? 3. Global South Representation Current Gap: Only 12% of JoM studies (1975-2020) examined developing economies Research Imperatives: Develop contextualized theories for emerging markets Study informal sector management practices Examine post-colonial organizational structures 4. Sustainability as Core Management Function Evolution Required: Move CSR from "special topic" to central strategic pillar Develop quantitative metrics for sustainability performance Reconcile short-term profit vs. long-term survival tensions Emerging Model: "Regenerative business" frameworks 5. The Future of Work Revisited New Dimensions: Human-AI teaming dynamics Four-generation workforce strategies Productivity paradoxes in hybrid work Research Method Shift: From snapshot studies to longitudinal digital ethnography 6. Methodological Renaissance Next Frontiers: Big data archaeology (mining historical corporate data) Virtual reality experiments for OB research Quantum computing applications in management science Balance Needed: High-tech methods with phenomenological depth 7. Impact Measurement Revolution Changing Standards: Beyond citations to real-world implementation metrics Co-creation with practitioners in research design Open science protocols for management studies Challenge: Protecting academic rigor while enhancing relevance Actionable Insights for Different Stakeholders For Researchers: Pursue high-risk, high-reward interdisciplinary projects Develop translational research pipelines Build global research networks beyond traditional hubs For Journal Editors: Create special issues on frontier topics Implement open peer-review systems Support replication studies and null-result publications For Business Schools: Redesign PhD programs to include data science literacy Develop executive education on emerging management paradigms Foster corporate-academic research partnerships For Practitioners: Participate in co-created research initiatives Apply evidence-based management with historical perspective Anticipate paradigm shifts revealed by citation trends The Path Forward The next era of management research must: Embrace complexity without losing theoretical parsimony Balance global perspectives with local relevance Harness technology while preserving humanistic values Measure impact beyond academic circles This bibliometric analysis serves as both a mirror and a map - reflecting our disciplinary journey while illuminating multiple paths forward. The most exciting management research may no longer fit traditional subfield boundaries but rather emerge at their intersections. Question for Reflection: As we stand on the shoulders of 45 years of giants, what new intellectual heights can we reach - and how will we ensure this knowledge genuinely improves organizational practice and human welfare?

Prof. Ramphul Ohlan
Maharshi Dayanand University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: A Bibliometric Analysis of First 45 Years of Journal of Management, Serials Review, June 2022, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2022.2066964.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page