What is it about?

This paper reads Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, through the lens of three themes in Spinoza’s philosophy. First, the bondage of the passions; second, the importance of the imitation of affects as grounding sociability; and, finally, the problematic relationship between human normative life and the rest of nature, posed by Spinoza’s immanent ontology. Like Spinoza’s exemplars in the Ethics and in the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, Shelley’s presentation of the modern Prometheus is intended to provide her readers with a vivid salutary lesson: hubris and narcissism engender disastrous forms of sociability. In contrast, the ars vivendi of the wise person centres on strength of character (fortitudo) which consists in achieving a balance between the care of one’s self (animositas) and the care of others (generositas).

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Shows influence of Spinoza on Mary Shelley

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Frankenstein, Spinoza, and exemplarity, Textual Practice, February 2019, Taylor & Francis, DOI: 10.1080/0950236x.2019.1581681.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

Be the first to contribute to this page