All Stories

  1. Developing an Evaluation Framework for Infectious Disease Modelling-to-Policy Pathways: A Qualitative Study Across Five Continents
  2. Towards a shared vision for research on evidence-informed policy-making
  3. Supporting policy through research funding: how UK funders can use Areas of Research Interest to bridge evidence gaps
  4. Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?
  5. Policy-led impact: engaging with the government science system
  6. Evaluating Policy to Research Fellowship programmes
  7. The Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (CAPE) programme in England: a mixed methods evaluation
  8. Common stages in the ARI process
  9. How can people use ARIs most productively?
  10. The Areas of Research Interest: a mechanism to improve evidence-policy/practice connections
  11. UK Government Science Advice System Mapping
  12. Everybody Cares About Using Education Research Sometimes
  13. Optimising the value of clinical research to the UK
  14. CAPE evaluation final report
  15. A modified action framework to develop and evaluate academic-policy engagement interventions
  16. Mapping the field of evidence production and use
  17. Development of an overarching framework for anticipating and assessing adverse and other unintended consequences of public health interventions (CONSEQUENT): a best-fit framework synthesis
  18. Improving the reporting of research impact assessments: a systematic review of biomedical funder research impact assessments
  19. Knowledge translation research priorities: an evidence synthesis
  20. Why Is It So Hard to Evaluate Knowledge Exchange? Comment on "Sustaining Knowledge Translation Practices: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis"
  21. How well do the UK government’s ‘areas of research interest’ work as boundary objects to facilitate the use of research in policymaking?
  22. Translating evidence into policy and practice: what do we know already, and what would further research look like?
  23. Improving the influence of evidence in policy creation: an ethnographic study of the research-to-policy collaborative
  24. Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?
  25. A qualitative evaluation of priority-setting by the Health Benefits Package Advisory Panel in Kenya
  26. What works to promote research-policy engagement?
  27. What funders are doing to assess the impact of their investments in health and biomedical research
  28. An evaluation of the evidence brief for policy development process in WHO EVIPNet Europe countries
  29. How Policy Appetites Shape, and Are Shaped by Evidence Production and Use
  30. Policy Mechanisms
  31. Comprehensive Sex Education Addressing Gender and Power: A Systematic Review to Investigate Implementation and Mechanisms of Impact
  32. Science Advice in the UK
  33. Evidence-Based Behaviour Change Intervention on Saiga Horn Medicine in Singapore: Research Brief
  34. An Evaluation of The Evidence Brief for Policy Development Process in WHO EVIPNet Europe Countries
  35. Are research-policy engagement activities informed by policy theory and evidence? 7 challenges to the UK impact agenda
  36. Evaluating a large-scale online behaviour change intervention aimed at wildlife product consumers in Singapore
  37. Lawmakers’ use of scientific evidence can be improved
  38. Using theory and evidence to design behaviour change interventions for reducing unsustainable wildlife consumption
  39. “Being Important” or “Knowing the Important”: Who Is Best Placed to Influence Policy?
  40. Evidence-based Policy and Public Value Management: Mutually Supporting Paradigms?
  41. Strategic advertising of online news articles as an intervention to influence wildlife product consumers
  42. Mapping the community: use of research evidence in policy and practice
  43. Correction: The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics
  44. Correction: Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  45. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore: Research Brief
  46. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  47. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  48. Understanding the unintended consequences of public health policies: the views of policymakers and evaluators
  49. Evaluating unintended consequences: New insights into solving practical, ethical and political challenges of evaluation
  50. Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations
  51. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?
  52. The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics
  53. How Should Academics Engage in Policymaking to Achieve Impact?
  54. Networks and network analysis in evidence, policy and practice
  55. Assessing the policy and practice impact of an international policy initiative: the State of the World’s Midwifery 2014
  56. Reducing ambiguity to close the science-policy gap
  57. Effectiveness of assistive technology in improving the safety of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  58. Three lessons from evidence-based medicine and policy: increase transparency, balance inputs and understand power
  59. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?
  60. Academic careers: what do early career researchers think?
  61. To Bridge the Divide between Evidence and Policy: Reduce Ambiguity as Much as Uncertainty
  62. the impact of evidence based policy
  63. Irked by naivety about policymaking
  64. Defining ‘evidence’ in public health: a survey of policymakers’ uses and preferences
  65. Identifying public health policymakers’ sources of information: comparing survey and network analyses
  66. Broadening public participation in systematic reviews: a case example involving young people in two configurative reviews
  67. Improving the identification and management of chronic kidney disease in primary care: lessons from a staged improvement collaborative
  68. New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature
  69. The influence of personal communities on the self-management of medication taking: A wider exploration of medicine work
  70. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
  71. Adverse effects of public health interventions: a conceptual framework
  72. Leadership, facilitation, and relationships are key to countering the waning influence of public health
  73. Does being overweight impede academic attainment? A systematic review
  74. Making the most of obesity research: developing research and policy objectives through evidence triangulation
  75. Who runs public health? A mixed-methods study combining qualitative and network analyses
  76. The human factor: Re-organisations in public health policy
  77. Comparing midwife‐led and doctor‐led maternity care: a systematic review of reviews
  78. The views of young children in the UK about obesity, body size, shape and weight: a systematic review
  79. Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities
  80. Incorporating uncertainty in aggregate burden of disease measures: an example of DALYs-averted by a smoking cessation campaign in the UK
  81. Randomised controlled trials for policy interventions: a review of reviews and meta-regression
  82. Improving the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in an Australian teaching hospital
  83. Attitudes to walking and cycling among children, young people and parents: a systematic review
  84. Assessment, investigation, and early management of head injury: summary of NICE guidance
  85. Management of faecal incontinence in adults: summary of NICE guidance