All Stories

  1. Towards a shared vision for research on evidence-informed policy-making
  2. Supporting policy through research funding: how UK funders can use Areas of Research Interest to bridge evidence gaps
  3. Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?
  4. Policy-led impact: engaging with the government science system
  5. Evaluating Policy to Research Fellowship programmes
  6. The Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (CAPE) programme in England: a mixed methods evaluation
  7. Common stages in the ARI process
  8. How can people use ARIs most productively?
  9. The Areas of Research Interest: a mechanism to improve evidence-policy/practice connections
  10. UK Government Science Advice System Mapping
  11. Everybody Cares About Using Education Research Sometimes
  12. Optimising the value of clinical research to the UK
  13. A modified action framework to develop and evaluate academic-policy engagement interventions
  14. Mapping the field of evidence production and use
  15. Development of an overarching framework for anticipating and assessing adverse and other unintended consequences of public health interventions (CONSEQUENT): a best-fit framework synthesis
  16. Improving the reporting of research impact assessments: a systematic review of biomedical funder research impact assessments
  17. Knowledge translation research priorities: an evidence synthesis
  18. Why Is It So Hard to Evaluate Knowledge Exchange? Comment on "Sustaining Knowledge Translation Practices: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis"
  19. How well do the UK government’s ‘areas of research interest’ work as boundary objects to facilitate the use of research in policymaking?
  20. Translating evidence into policy and practice: what do we know already, and what would further research look like?
  21. Improving the influence of evidence in policy creation: an ethnographic study of the research-to-policy collaborative
  22. Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?
  23. A qualitative evaluation of priority-setting by the Health Benefits Package Advisory Panel in Kenya
  24. What works to promote research-policy engagement?
  25. What funders are doing to assess the impact of their investments in health and biomedical research
  26. An evaluation of the evidence brief for policy development process in WHO EVIPNet Europe countries
  27. How Policy Appetites Shape, and Are Shaped by Evidence Production and Use
  28. Policy Mechanisms
  29. Comprehensive Sex Education Addressing Gender and Power: A Systematic Review to Investigate Implementation and Mechanisms of Impact
  30. Science Advice in the UK
  31. Evidence-Based Behaviour Change Intervention on Saiga Horn Medicine in Singapore: Research Brief
  32. An Evaluation of The Evidence Brief for Policy Development Process in WHO EVIPNet Europe Countries
  33. Are research-policy engagement activities informed by policy theory and evidence? 7 challenges to the UK impact agenda
  34. Evaluating a large-scale online behaviour change intervention aimed at wildlife product consumers in Singapore
  35. Lawmakers’ use of scientific evidence can be improved
  36. Using theory and evidence to design behaviour change interventions for reducing unsustainable wildlife consumption
  37. “Being Important” or “Knowing the Important”: Who Is Best Placed to Influence Policy?
  38. Evidence-based Policy and Public Value Management: Mutually Supporting Paradigms?
  39. Strategic advertising of online news articles as an intervention to influence wildlife product consumers
  40. Mapping the community: use of research evidence in policy and practice
  41. Correction: The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics
  42. Correction: Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  43. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore: Research Brief
  44. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  45. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  46. Understanding the unintended consequences of public health policies: the views of policymakers and evaluators
  47. Evaluating unintended consequences: New insights into solving practical, ethical and political challenges of evaluation
  48. Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations
  49. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?
  50. The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics
  51. How Should Academics Engage in Policymaking to Achieve Impact?
  52. Networks and network analysis in evidence, policy and practice
  53. Assessing the policy and practice impact of an international policy initiative: the State of the World’s Midwifery 2014
  54. Reducing ambiguity to close the science-policy gap
  55. Effectiveness of assistive technology in improving the safety of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  56. Three lessons from evidence-based medicine and policy: increase transparency, balance inputs and understand power
  57. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?
  58. Academic careers: what do early career researchers think?
  59. To Bridge the Divide between Evidence and Policy: Reduce Ambiguity as Much as Uncertainty
  60. the impact of evidence based policy
  61. Irked by naivety about policymaking
  62. Defining ‘evidence’ in public health: a survey of policymakers’ uses and preferences
  63. Identifying public health policymakers’ sources of information: comparing survey and network analyses
  64. Broadening public participation in systematic reviews: a case example involving young people in two configurative reviews
  65. Improving the identification and management of chronic kidney disease in primary care: lessons from a staged improvement collaborative
  66. New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature
  67. The influence of personal communities on the self-management of medication taking: A wider exploration of medicine work
  68. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
  69. Adverse effects of public health interventions: a conceptual framework
  70. Leadership, facilitation, and relationships are key to countering the waning influence of public health
  71. Does being overweight impede academic attainment? A systematic review
  72. Making the most of obesity research: developing research and policy objectives through evidence triangulation
  73. Who runs public health? A mixed-methods study combining qualitative and network analyses
  74. The human factor: Re-organisations in public health policy
  75. Comparing midwife‐led and doctor‐led maternity care: a systematic review of reviews
  76. The views of young children in the UK about obesity, body size, shape and weight: a systematic review
  77. Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities
  78. Incorporating uncertainty in aggregate burden of disease measures: an example of DALYs-averted by a smoking cessation campaign in the UK
  79. Randomised controlled trials for policy interventions: a review of reviews and meta-regression
  80. Improving the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in an Australian teaching hospital
  81. Attitudes to walking and cycling among children, young people and parents: a systematic review
  82. Assessment, investigation, and early management of head injury: summary of NICE guidance
  83. Management of faecal incontinence in adults: summary of NICE guidance