All Stories

  1. Developing an Evaluation Framework for Infectious Disease Modelling-to-Policy Pathways: A Qualitative Study Across Five Continents
  2. Towards a shared vision for research on evidence-informed policy-making
  3. Supporting policy through research funding: how UK funders can use Areas of Research Interest to bridge evidence gaps
  4. Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?
  5. Policy-led impact: engaging with the government science system
  6. Evaluating Policy to Research Fellowship programmes
  7. The Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (CAPE) programme in England: a mixed methods evaluation
  8. Common stages in the ARI process
  9. How can people use ARIs most productively?
  10. The Areas of Research Interest: a mechanism to improve evidence-policy/practice connections
  11. UK Government Science Advice System Mapping
  12. Everybody Cares About Using Education Research Sometimes
  13. Optimising the value of clinical research to the UK
  14. A modified action framework to develop and evaluate academic-policy engagement interventions
  15. Mapping the field of evidence production and use
  16. Development of an overarching framework for anticipating and assessing adverse and other unintended consequences of public health interventions (CONSEQUENT): a best-fit framework synthesis
  17. Improving the reporting of research impact assessments: a systematic review of biomedical funder research impact assessments
  18. Knowledge translation research priorities: an evidence synthesis
  19. Why Is It So Hard to Evaluate Knowledge Exchange? Comment on "Sustaining Knowledge Translation Practices: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis"
  20. How well do the UK government’s ‘areas of research interest’ work as boundary objects to facilitate the use of research in policymaking?
  21. Translating evidence into policy and practice: what do we know already, and what would further research look like?
  22. Improving the influence of evidence in policy creation: an ethnographic study of the research-to-policy collaborative
  23. Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?
  24. A qualitative evaluation of priority-setting by the Health Benefits Package Advisory Panel in Kenya
  25. What works to promote research-policy engagement?
  26. What funders are doing to assess the impact of their investments in health and biomedical research
  27. An evaluation of the evidence brief for policy development process in WHO EVIPNet Europe countries
  28. How Policy Appetites Shape, and Are Shaped by Evidence Production and Use
  29. Policy Mechanisms
  30. Comprehensive Sex Education Addressing Gender and Power: A Systematic Review to Investigate Implementation and Mechanisms of Impact
  31. Science Advice in the UK
  32. Evidence-Based Behaviour Change Intervention on Saiga Horn Medicine in Singapore: Research Brief
  33. An Evaluation of The Evidence Brief for Policy Development Process in WHO EVIPNet Europe Countries
  34. Are research-policy engagement activities informed by policy theory and evidence? 7 challenges to the UK impact agenda
  35. Evaluating a large-scale online behaviour change intervention aimed at wildlife product consumers in Singapore
  36. Lawmakers’ use of scientific evidence can be improved
  37. Using theory and evidence to design behaviour change interventions for reducing unsustainable wildlife consumption
  38. “Being Important” or “Knowing the Important”: Who Is Best Placed to Influence Policy?
  39. Evidence-based Policy and Public Value Management: Mutually Supporting Paradigms?
  40. Strategic advertising of online news articles as an intervention to influence wildlife product consumers
  41. Mapping the community: use of research evidence in policy and practice
  42. Correction: The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics
  43. Correction: Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  44. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore: Research Brief
  45. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  46. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  47. Understanding the unintended consequences of public health policies: the views of policymakers and evaluators
  48. Evaluating unintended consequences: New insights into solving practical, ethical and political challenges of evaluation
  49. Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations
  50. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?
  51. The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics
  52. How Should Academics Engage in Policymaking to Achieve Impact?
  53. Networks and network analysis in evidence, policy and practice
  54. Assessing the policy and practice impact of an international policy initiative: the State of the World’s Midwifery 2014
  55. Reducing ambiguity to close the science-policy gap
  56. Effectiveness of assistive technology in improving the safety of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  57. Three lessons from evidence-based medicine and policy: increase transparency, balance inputs and understand power
  58. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?
  59. Academic careers: what do early career researchers think?
  60. To Bridge the Divide between Evidence and Policy: Reduce Ambiguity as Much as Uncertainty
  61. the impact of evidence based policy
  62. Irked by naivety about policymaking
  63. Defining ‘evidence’ in public health: a survey of policymakers’ uses and preferences
  64. Identifying public health policymakers’ sources of information: comparing survey and network analyses
  65. Broadening public participation in systematic reviews: a case example involving young people in two configurative reviews
  66. Improving the identification and management of chronic kidney disease in primary care: lessons from a staged improvement collaborative
  67. New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature
  68. The influence of personal communities on the self-management of medication taking: A wider exploration of medicine work
  69. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
  70. Adverse effects of public health interventions: a conceptual framework
  71. Leadership, facilitation, and relationships are key to countering the waning influence of public health
  72. Does being overweight impede academic attainment? A systematic review
  73. Making the most of obesity research: developing research and policy objectives through evidence triangulation
  74. Who runs public health? A mixed-methods study combining qualitative and network analyses
  75. The human factor: Re-organisations in public health policy
  76. Comparing midwife‐led and doctor‐led maternity care: a systematic review of reviews
  77. The views of young children in the UK about obesity, body size, shape and weight: a systematic review
  78. Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities
  79. Incorporating uncertainty in aggregate burden of disease measures: an example of DALYs-averted by a smoking cessation campaign in the UK
  80. Randomised controlled trials for policy interventions: a review of reviews and meta-regression
  81. Improving the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in an Australian teaching hospital
  82. Attitudes to walking and cycling among children, young people and parents: a systematic review
  83. Assessment, investigation, and early management of head injury: summary of NICE guidance
  84. Management of faecal incontinence in adults: summary of NICE guidance