All Stories

  1. Towards a shared vision for research on evidence-informed policy-making
  2. Supporting policy through research funding: how UK funders can use Areas of Research Interest to bridge evidence gaps
  3. Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?
  4. Policy-led impact: engaging with the government science system
  5. Evaluating Policy to Research Fellowship programmes
  6. The Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (CAPE) programme in England: a mixed methods evaluation
  7. A modified action framework to develop and evaluate academic-policy engagement interventions
  8. Mapping the field of evidence production and use
  9. Development of an overarching framework for anticipating and assessing adverse and other unintended consequences of public health interventions (CONSEQUENT): a best-fit framework synthesis
  10. Improving the reporting of research impact assessments: a systematic review of biomedical funder research impact assessments
  11. Knowledge translation research priorities: an evidence synthesis
  12. Why Is It So Hard to Evaluate Knowledge Exchange? Comment on "Sustaining Knowledge Translation Practices: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis"
  13. How well do the UK government’s ‘areas of research interest’ work as boundary objects to facilitate the use of research in policymaking?
  14. Translating evidence into policy and practice: what do we know already, and what would further research look like?
  15. Improving the influence of evidence in policy creation: an ethnographic study of the research-to-policy collaborative
  16. Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?
  17. A qualitative evaluation of priority-setting by the Health Benefits Package Advisory Panel in Kenya
  18. What works to promote research-policy engagement?
  19. What funders are doing to assess the impact of their investments in health and biomedical research
  20. An evaluation of the evidence brief for policy development process in WHO EVIPNet Europe countries
  21. How Policy Appetites Shape, and Are Shaped by Evidence Production and Use
  22. Policy Mechanisms
  23. Comprehensive Sex Education Addressing Gender and Power: A Systematic Review to Investigate Implementation and Mechanisms of Impact
  24. Science Advice in the UK
  25. Evidence-Based Behaviour Change Intervention on Saiga Horn Medicine in Singapore: Research Brief
  26. An Evaluation of The Evidence Brief for Policy Development Process in WHO EVIPNet Europe Countries
  27. Are research-policy engagement activities informed by policy theory and evidence? 7 challenges to the UK impact agenda
  28. Evaluating a large-scale online behaviour change intervention aimed at wildlife product consumers in Singapore
  29. Lawmakers’ use of scientific evidence can be improved
  30. Using theory and evidence to design behaviour change interventions for reducing unsustainable wildlife consumption
  31. “Being Important” or “Knowing the Important”: Who Is Best Placed to Influence Policy?
  32. Evidence-based Policy and Public Value Management: Mutually Supporting Paradigms?
  33. Strategic advertising of online news articles as an intervention to influence wildlife product consumers
  34. Mapping the community: use of research evidence in policy and practice
  35. Correction: The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics
  36. Correction: Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  37. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore: Research Brief
  38. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  39. Saiga horn user characteristics, motivations, and purchasing behaviour in Singapore
  40. Understanding the unintended consequences of public health policies: the views of policymakers and evaluators
  41. Evaluating unintended consequences: New insights into solving practical, ethical and political challenges of evaluation
  42. Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations
  43. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?
  44. The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics
  45. How Should Academics Engage in Policymaking to Achieve Impact?
  46. Networks and network analysis in evidence, policy and practice
  47. Assessing the policy and practice impact of an international policy initiative: the State of the World’s Midwifery 2014
  48. Reducing ambiguity to close the science-policy gap
  49. Effectiveness of assistive technology in improving the safety of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  50. Three lessons from evidence-based medicine and policy: increase transparency, balance inputs and understand power
  51. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?
  52. Academic careers: what do early career researchers think?
  53. To Bridge the Divide between Evidence and Policy: Reduce Ambiguity as Much as Uncertainty
  54. the impact of evidence based policy
  55. Irked by naivety about policymaking
  56. Defining ‘evidence’ in public health: a survey of policymakers’ uses and preferences
  57. Identifying public health policymakers’ sources of information: comparing survey and network analyses
  58. Broadening public participation in systematic reviews: a case example involving young people in two configurative reviews
  59. Improving the identification and management of chronic kidney disease in primary care: lessons from a staged improvement collaborative
  60. New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature
  61. The influence of personal communities on the self-management of medication taking: A wider exploration of medicine work
  62. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
  63. Adverse effects of public health interventions: a conceptual framework
  64. Leadership, facilitation, and relationships are key to countering the waning influence of public health
  65. Does being overweight impede academic attainment? A systematic review
  66. Making the most of obesity research: developing research and policy objectives through evidence triangulation
  67. Who runs public health? A mixed-methods study combining qualitative and network analyses
  68. The human factor: Re-organisations in public health policy
  69. Comparing midwife‐led and doctor‐led maternity care: a systematic review of reviews
  70. The views of young children in the UK about obesity, body size, shape and weight: a systematic review
  71. Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities
  72. Incorporating uncertainty in aggregate burden of disease measures: an example of DALYs-averted by a smoking cessation campaign in the UK
  73. Randomised controlled trials for policy interventions: a review of reviews and meta-regression
  74. Improving the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in an Australian teaching hospital
  75. Attitudes to walking and cycling among children, young people and parents: a systematic review
  76. Assessment, investigation, and early management of head injury: summary of NICE guidance
  77. Management of faecal incontinence in adults: summary of NICE guidance