All Stories

  1. Last resort as a justification for compulsory nasogastric tube feeding of adults with anorexia nervosa
  2. What’s in a name? Abbasi and Another v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust ; Haastrup v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2025] UKS...
  3. Fifty years of the Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976: A spent statute?
  4. Legal decisions on longstanding severe eating disorders
  5. Evolving judicial approaches to longstanding anorexia nervosa
  6. Afterword
  7. Advocating distinct regulatory paths for embryos and embryo-like structures
  8. How should we decide how to treat the child: harm versus best interests in cases of disagreement
  9. Book review: Medicine, Patients and the Law Medicine, Patients and the Law, BrazierMargaretCaveEmmaHeywoodRob, eds., 7th ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2023), 696 pp., 39.50 (GBP), ISBN 978 1 5261 5717 1
  10. The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology (1984)
  11. Skeleton Keys to Hospital Doors: Adolescent Adults who Refuse Life‐Sustaining Medical Treatment
  12. Should states restrict recipient choice amongst relevant and available COVID-19 vaccines?
  13. Involving parents in paediatric clinical ethics committee deliberations: a current controversy
  14. Clinical ethics support services during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a cross-sectional survey
  15. Challenging misconceptions about clinical ethics support during COVID-19 and beyond: a legal update and future considerations
  16. Confirmation of the High Court’s Power to Override a Child’s Treatment Decision: A NHS Trust v X (In the matter of X (A Child) (No 2)) [2021] EWHC 65 (Fam)
  17. Valid consent to medical treatment
  18. Informing patients: The Bolam legacy
  19. COVID-19 Super-spreaders: Definitional Quandaries and Implications
  20. Selecting Treatment Options and Choosing Between them: Delineating Patient and Professional Autonomy in Shared Decision-Making
  21. Think of the Children: Liability for Non-Disclosure of Information Post-Montgomery
  22. EU Clinical Trials Regulation 2014: Fetter or facilitator?
  23. Who Knows Best (Interests)? The Case of Charlie Gard
  24. Editorial
  25. Debating the future of mandatory vaccination
  26. Mandated vaccination
  27. Montgomery, consent and the therapeutic exception
  28. Vulnerable patients
  29. Pioneering Healthcare Law
  30. Confidentiality
  31. Human rights, capacity and mental health
  32. Vaccination refusal
  33. Adolescent consent to medical treatment
  34. Competence and authority: adolescent treatment refusals for physical and mental health conditions
  35. Adolescent treatment refusal
  36. Fascilitating clinical research on vulnerable populations
  37. Adolescent Consent and Confi dentiality in the UK
  38. Why we wrote… Medicine, Patients and the Law
  39. Research ethics
  40. Reforming the ethical review system: balancing the rights and interests of research participants with the duty to facilitate good research
  41. Drink and Drugs in Pregnancy: Can the Law Prevent Avoidable Harm to the Future Child?
  42. Milgram and Tuskegee — Paradigm Research Projects in Bioethics
  43. New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest
  44. Data protection legislation: interpretation and barriers to research
  45. Adolescent Consent to Medical Treatment