What is it about?

Patients have a right to autonomy that encompasses making medical decisions that others consider ‘bad’. In fact there are a number of circumstances in which the law can intervene to protect patients with mental capacity from their bad decisions. The circumstances in which this is true and the normative justifications are critiqued in this paper.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The article reveals the inadequacies of the legal protection of the autonomy rights of those considered 'vulnerable'. It also raises important questions about the duties of clinicians, particularly in light of new liabilities for neglect which may lead to defensive practices and risk hard paternalism.

Perspectives

Based on this research, I have contributed to calls in 2017 for a Vulnerable Adults Bill. See http://www.mentalcapacitylawandpolicy.org.uk/vulnerable-adults-bill-help-wanted/

Professor Emma Cave
Durham University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Protecting Patients from their Bad Decisions: Rebalancing Rights, Relationships, and Risk, Medical Law Review, January 2017, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fww046.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page