What is it about?
The paper is based on naturalistic data collected in Halls of Residence in a UK University. It explores what differences in any there are between L1 and L2 speakers of English
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The paper identifies three possible areas of difficulty that may arise if a theory is not contextualised. Firstly, the paper argues that theory driven research encourages methods of data collection that we characterize as experimental and suggest that these need to be supplemented by more naturalistic forms of data collection. Secondly, the paper criticizes the view that there are general preferences as to who initiates and who completes repairs and argues that a contextualized theory of repair would capture initiation/completion patterns more adequately. Finally, the paper argues that the distinction between native and non-native speakers needs to be re-examined. This is supported by the finding in the pilot study that there was little variation between native and non-native speakers in terms of these analyses.
Perspectives
The data we collected raises questions about the theoretical frameworks used to explore conversational breakdowns and argues that conversations are better seen as a reflection of individual circumstances rather than generic categories such as native and non-native speakers.
Dr Richard Badger
University of Leeds
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Some aspects of repair in native and non-native speaker conversations in English, ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, January 1999, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/itl.125-126.05ele.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
