What is it about?
Part I of this paper outlined the three standard approaches to the teaching of critical thinking: the normative (or philosophical), cognitive psychology, and educational taxonomy approaches. The paper contrasted these with the visualisation approach; in particular, computer-aided argument mapping (CAAM), and presented a detailed account of the CAAM methodology and a theoretical justification for its use. This part develops further support for CAAM.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Computer-Aided Argument Mapping and the Teaching of Critical Thinking, Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, January 2012, Philosophy Documentation Center,
DOI: 10.5840/inquiryct201227317.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page