What is it about?
This study looks at how people in Grenada understand and deal with rabies, a deadly disease that can spread from animals to humans. Importantly, Grenada has not had a single human rabies case since 1970—a major public health success. The researchers wanted to understand what is helping maintain this achievement and where improvements are still needed. To do this, they surveyed nearly 1,000 households across the island, focusing on people who own animals such as dogs, cats, or livestock. They asked questions about knowledge of rabies, how people protect their animals, and what they think about the government’s rabies control program. The findings show that most people have heard of rabies and know it can spread through animal bites. However, many are unsure about which animals can carry the disease, the signs of rabies in animals, and how long vaccines protect animals. While about three-quarters of respondents know that vaccination prevents rabies, only about half of pet owners had vaccinated their animals in the past year, and even fewer had vaccinated livestock. Participation in government vaccination programs was also relatively low. The study also found that many people are not fully aware of all the efforts being made to control rabies, such as stray dog control, mongoose trapping, and public education campaigns. Barriers to vaccination included lack of awareness, inconvenience, and difficulty transporting animals. Overall, the study highlights that while Grenada has successfully prevented human rabies cases, there are still gaps in public knowledge and participation in prevention programs. The authors recommend stronger public education, more accessible vaccination services, and improved awareness of government efforts. These steps will help ensure that Grenada can continue to keep rabies under control and protect both people and animals in the future.
Featured Image
Photo by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This study is both unique and timely in several important ways that can broaden its appeal and increase readership. First, it is the first population-based study in Grenada to systematically examine how everyday people understand and respond to rabies. While many studies focus on countries with ongoing human rabies deaths, this research looks at a rare and underexplored scenario: how a country has successfully maintained zero human rabies cases for over 50 years. This shifts the narrative from crisis response to prevention and sustainability, which is highly relevant for global health audiences working toward rabies elimination. Second, the study is timely because it aligns with global “Zero by 30” rabies elimination goals led by international agencies. Understanding what works in places like Grenada provides real-world evidence for maintaining elimination, not just achieving it. Many countries are approaching low case numbers, but far fewer have guidance on how to prevent re-emergence, making this study particularly valuable. Third, the research applies a One Health perspective, examining the connections between human behavior, animal health (pets, livestock, wildlife like mongooses), and public health systems. This integrated lens is increasingly emphasized in global health, climate-health, and zoonotic disease preparedness, making the study relevant beyond rabies alone. Fourth, it highlights a critical and often overlooked issue: even in successful settings, knowledge gaps and low participation in prevention programs persist. This challenges the assumption that “zero cases” means “problem solved” and instead underscores the need for continuous community engagement, education, and system strengthening. Finally, the study has practical, policy-relevant implications. It identifies specific, actionable gaps—such as low vaccination coverage, limited awareness of government programs, and logistical barriers—that can inform targeted interventions. This makes the research useful not just for academics, but also for policymakers, veterinarians, and public health practitioners.
Perspectives
From my perspective, what makes this study especially compelling is how it reframes the rabies conversation. Much of the global literature focuses on outbreaks, deaths, and emergency responses. Here, the emphasis is different. It asks a quieter but more important question: how do we sustain success once a disease is under control? Working in and with low-resource settings, this shift resonates strongly. In many countries, health systems are stretched, and the default approach is often reactive—responding to crises as they arise. Grenada’s experience shows that long-term success depends on something less visible but more demanding: consistent prevention, community awareness, and sustained public health engagement. What stands out is that even with zero human rabies cases for decades, gaps in knowledge, vaccination practices, and program awareness still exist. This underscores an important lesson—absence of disease does not mean absence of risk. Maintaining that zero status requires ongoing investment, not complacency. For low-resource countries, this is a powerful message. Prevention is not only more effective than crisis response; it is also more cost-efficient and sustainable. By documenting the behaviors, systems, and gaps that influence continued success, this study provides a practical roadmap for other settings aiming not just to eliminate rabies, but to keep it eliminated.
Dr. Martin S Forde
St. George's University, Grenada
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices with Implications for Maintaining Zero Human Cases of Rabies in Grenada, April 2026, IntechOpen,
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1015327.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
