What is it about?
Tebentafusp (IMCgp100) is a novel bispecific immunotherapy that contains a specifically engineered soluble T-cell receptor (TCR) capable of recognising the gp100 epitope on the surface of tumour cells presented by human leukocyte antigen-A*02:01 (HLA- A*02:01 (HLA-A2) is a specific allele within the HLA-A2 group). The HLA-A2 is then fused to the single-chain variable fragment of anti-CD3, which binds to T-cells and destroys them. Tebentafusp has been shown to cause a significant increase in pro-inflammatory cytokine levels that are detrimental to the tumour. The preliminary results of tebentafusp in solid tumours are encouraging, particularly in advanced/metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). In a randomised phase III study (IMCgp100-202; n = 378), patients with untreated HLA*02:01 positive metastatic UM (mUM), tebentafusp significantly improved overall survival (OS) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.51 compared to the investigator’s choice, mainly pembrolizumab (82%). The one-year OS rate for tebentafusp was 73% compared to 59% for pembrolizumab. For comparison, the single-arm GEM1402 study (n = 52) reported a one-year OS rate of 52% for the combination of nivolumab and Ipilimumab in metastatic UM. The most common adverse reactions related to tebentafusp include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and dermatological reactions such as rash. It is the first drug with OS benefit in advanced/metastatic UM patients. However, further research is needed to optimise its use, improve patient selection, develop combination therapies and identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers.
Featured Image
Photo by Harpreet Singh on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Until 2022, there was no universally recommended treatment for mUM. Various systemic therapies, including immunotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapies and their combinations, have been studied in prospective clinical trials. However, most of these trials, often retrospective, were conducted in small groups of fewer than 50 patients, had failed to demonstrate the superior efficacy of new systemic therapies over chemotherapy. The exception is recent evidence on tebentafusp, specifically targeted at HLA-A*02:01 positive patients and has shown promising results in controlled trials. Our comprehensive review adresses both clinical and preclinical evidence regarding the use of tebentafusp.
Perspectives
This immunotherapy, which directly engages the patient’s immune system to target and destroy tumour cells, has set a new standard for treatment efficacy in this rare and aggressive form of cancer. Combining a T-cell receptor with an anti-CD3 single-chain variable fragment, its bi-specific mechanism harnesses the body’s natural defences. This novel approach has shown superior overall survival results in clinical trials compared to treatments such as pembrolizumab. Despite these advances, the use of tebentafusp is limited by genetic factors, particularly the requirement for HLA-A*02:01 expression, which is absent in a significant proportion of the target population. This limitation restricts the widespread use of this therapy and highlights the need for genetic screening prior to treatment. In addition, while the adverse effects associated with tebentafusp, such as CRS and skin reactions, are manageable and tend to decrease over time, they require careful monitoring and management, which could complicate treatment protocols and patient compliance. In light of these findings, it is clear that while tebentafusp represents a significant leap forward in the treatment of mUM, there is a critical need for further research. While tebentafusp has already demonstrated a survival benefit in metastatic uveal melanoma and is approved in this setting, there are currently no approved or standard adjuvant therapies for patients at high risk of relapse after definitive local treatment of their primary tumour. This is particularly concerning given that approximately 50% of patients will eventually develop metastatic disease despite successful surgery or radiotherapy. The EORTC ATOM trial (NCT06246149) is the first and only active phase 3 trial evaluating adjuvant tebentafusp in this population. It aims to determine whether early intervention with this T-cell receptor-based therapy can reduce the risk of relapse compared to observation alone. This is a clinically important question, as relapse in uveal melanoma is typically incurable and associated with poor survival. Future studies should focus on overcoming the genetic limitations of treatment applicability by developing strategies that could extend the benefits of tebentafusp to a broader patient base. In addition, the refinement of combination therapies that can synergise with the mechanism of tebentafusp could mitigate its limitations and enhance its efficacy. Research into biomarkers to predict treatment response and tailor therapies to individual patients will also be key to advancing the personalized medicine approach in this field.
Piotr Remiszewski
Maria Sklodowska - Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Poland
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Tebentafusp (IMCgp100) in the treatment of uveal melanoma — from preclinical evidence to clinical practice, Nowotwory Journal of Oncology, April 2025, VM Media SP. zo.o VM Group SK,
DOI: 10.5603/njo.104457.
You can read the full text:
Resources
How to use tebetafusp in uveal melanoma
what is tebentafusp? how to use it? full-text
DOI
Remiszewski, P., Siedlecki, E., Wąż, J., Filipek, K., Pisklak, A., Gaik, W., … & Czarnecka, A. M. (2025). Tebentafusp (IMCgp100) in the treatment of uveal melanoma — from preclinical evidence to clinical practice. Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology, 75(2), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.5603/njo.104457
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







