What is it about?

This study reports the relative effectiveness of the inclusion theory when the combined strategy instruction on improving the reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts for students with dyslexia is implemented. A total sample of 298 students of English as a foreign language from both public and private schools participated in the study which employed a pre-test- post-test control group design to investigate the efficacy of combined strategy instruction consisting of Graphic organizers, Visual displays, Mnemonic illustrations, Computer exercises, Prediction, Inference, Text structure awareness, Main idea identification, Summarization, and Questioning. The study concluded that combined strategy instruction in the field of the inclusion theory is more effective than regular instruction in improving reading comprehension when using narrative texts, but there’s no difference, when using expository texts. There was no significant difference neither by gender nor by school types in all the grade levels under study.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The present study is significant since it proposes a combined reading intervention treatment to improve the reading comprehension of learners with dyslexia in inclusive environments whereby social justice and equality are ensured, and learners without dyslexia are directed to improve their reading comprehension skills as well. Suggate (2016) indicated that there is scarcity in the research that investigates the long-term effect sizes of reading interventions in general and of intervention type in particular. However, some studies reported the long-term effects of one and not more than one intervention type such as phonemic awareness on improving reading comprehension (Swanson et al., 1999). As such, the low number of conducted studies does not provide a dependable estimation. Instruction is significantly effective when it is tailored in accordance with the needs of students who receive the instruction; however, there is no single strategy to ensure success for children of the same school-age. Some research provided insignificant differences indicating that there has been a focus on providing more individualized instruction than group interventions; in disagreement with general education learners who often receive instruction in big classroom-sized groups, interventions with learners with reading difficulties often take place in individualized environments (Goodwin & Ahn, 2013).

Perspectives

This study is framed within two global theoretical frameworks; construction-integration (C-I) model (Kintsch, 1988) and the reader’s situation model (Van Dijk & Kintsch, 1983). The modern reading theory involved the construction-integration (C-I) model (Kintsch, 1988) which entailed the reader’s cognitive architecture and cognitive procedures related to retrieval operations and to text devices comprising argumentation connection that facilitated comprehension. The reader’s situation model (Van Dijk & Kintsch, 1983), the construction-integration (C-I) model and the reader’s situation model entail inferential comprehension that pertain to the cognitive subtleties of text comprehension. The construction-integration (C-I) theory assumes that the text comprehension could be explicated by a collaborative combination of top-down process which is knowledge-guided and bottom-up process which is word-guided. Comprehension is a complex process that provides a set of interrelated assumptions which can form theoretical models with propositions. Specifically, the present study is framed within the context of the inclusion and integration theories in opposition to the segregation theory; that is, should learners with dyslexia be grouped together and separated from learners without dyslexia, or should they be placed in a more inclusive setting where they are integrated with learners with dyslexia? Inclusion requires full engagement in general education; inclusion necessitates providing support and services to students with special needs within normalized settings and “without the isolation and stigma often associated with special education services” (Sapon-Shevin, 1996, p. 39).

Dr. Ghada M. Awada
American University of Beirut

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Effect of Inclusion Versus Segregation on Reading Comprehension of EFL Learners with Dyslexia: Case of Lebanon, English Language Teaching, August 2017, Canadian Center of Science and Education,
DOI: 10.5539/elt.v10n9p49.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page