What is it about?

downloadable at https://www.academia.edu/25106394/_Modernity_Madness_Disenchantment_Don_Quixote_s_Hunger_Symplokē_A_Journal_for_the_Intermingling_of_Literary_Cultural_and_Theoretical_Scholarship_2011_

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Part Two of Don Quixote, which Cervantes published in 1615, a decade after Part One, is—to risk an anachronism—a seventeenth-century version of the soft reboot. In this, Quixote remains the same deluded knight-errant he was in Part One, but the world he inhabits is one in which both Don Quixote Part One and Avellaneda’s noncanonical volume also exist. Whereas Part One of Don Quixote chronicled the tragicomic adventures of a man “enchanted by a dream of resurrecting the courtly ethos in a world which has long ago forsaken it,” Part Two unfolds a tragedy of the disenchantment that comes from living as a fictional character in a real world. Throughout the novel, Quixote encounters people who, having read of his exploits, manipulate him for their own amusement. No longer just a naïve reader, Quixote is also the one who is read. https://daily.jstor.org/is-don-quixote-to-blame-for-modern-movie-reboots/

Perspectives

https://daily.jstor.org/is-don-quixote-to-blame-for-modern-movie-reboots/

Professor, Islamic World and Comparative Literatures Rebecca Ruth Gould
University of Birmingham

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Modernity, Madness, Disenchantment: Don Quixote's Hunger, symplokē, January 2011, University of Nebraska Press,
DOI: 10.5250/symploke.19.1-2.0035.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page