What is it about?
Historical study has traditionally been built around the placement of the human at the center of inquiry. The de-stabilized concepts of the human in contemporary thought challenge this configuration. However, the ways in which these challenges provoke new historical perspectives both expand and enrich historical study but are also weak and vulnerable in their concept of the human, lacking or omitting something valuable in our self-understanding. A Personalist Philosophy of History argues for a robust concept of personhood in our experience of the past as a way to resolve this conflict.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Focused on those who know history, rather than on the abstract properties of knowledge, it extends the moral agency of persons into non-human, trans-human, and deep history domains. It describes an approach to moral life through historical experience and study, rather than through abstractions. And it describes a kind of historiography that matches factual accuracy to both the constructed nature of understanding and to unavoidable moral purpose.
Perspectives
Why knowing the past is best practiced as the development of our moral responsibility.
Bennett Gilbert
Portland State University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Introduction, January 2019, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.4324/9781351216265-1.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







