What is it about?

This study utilizes the seven bivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models to forecast the out-of-sample value-at-risk (VaR) of 21 stock portfolios and seven currency-stock portfolios with three weight combinations, and then employs three accuracy tests and one efficiency test to evaluate the VaR forecast performance for the above models. The seven models are constructed by four types of bivariate variance-covariance specifications and two approaches of parameters estimates. The four types of bivariate variance-covariance specifications are the constant conditional correlation (CCC), asymmetric and symmetric dynamic conditional correlation (ADCC and DCC), and the BEKK, whereas the two types of approach include the standard and non-standard approaches. The results are used to investigate which bivariate variance-covariance specification and which parameter estimate approach has a better VaR forecast performance, and whether the asymmetric DCC model has a better forecast performance than its corresponding symmetric one. In addition, this study also explores whether the different weight combinations and component combinations of portfolios will affect the results.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

regarding the accuracy tests, the VaR forecast performance of stock portfolios varies with the variance-covariance specifications and the approaches of parameters estimate, whereas it does not vary with the weight combinations of portfolios. Conversely, the VaR forecast performance of currency-stock portfolios is almost the same for all models and still does not vary with the weight combinations of portfolios. Regarding the efficiency test via market risk capital, the NS-BEKK model is the most suitable model to be used in the stock and currency-stock portfolios for bank risk managers irrespective of the weight combination of portfolios.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The Value-At-Risk Estimate of Stock and Currency-Stock Portfolios’ Returns, Risks, November 2018, MDPI AG,
DOI: 10.3390/risks6040133.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page