What is it about?

Recent work on Hume’s Theory of Perception has shown that Hume takes the appearance of impressions to vary according to the ideas under which they are subsumed. In this paper, I argue that the vulgar position in the section where he discusses the Inference from Constancy is characterized by an ideal primordial state of mind where impressions are directly encountered without being subsumed under any idea. In particular, impressions which are not subsumed under the idea of a perception do not appear to the mind as impressions. Read in this light, Hume’s Inference from Constancy is immune to the difficulties which have commonly been raised against it.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Reading Hume's Inference from Constancy from the Vulgar Standpoint, Journal of Scottish Philosophy, September 2012, Edinburgh University Press,
DOI: 10.3366/jsp.2012.0040.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page