What is it about?
Traditional university lectures often face criticism for being too passive, with students simply listening and not actively participating. This study investigated whether adding interactive teaching methods to a two-semester lecture series on the history of popular music could make learning more effective. We looked at eight different methods designed to encourage communication among students, such as discussing questions with classmates or working in small groups. Our findings, based on responses from 209 students, suggest that while these methods can certainly add value and make lectures more engaging, they don't necessarily replace the systematic presentation of information by the lecturer. The study explores how different methods impact knowledge acquisition and communication among students, aiming to understand how to best support active learning in large lecture setting.
Featured Image
Photo by Wan San Yip on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This work is timely as it addresses an ongoing discussion in higher education about the effectiveness of traditional lectures and how to make them more interactive and student-centred. What makes this study unique is its quantitative evaluation of specific communication-stimulating methods within a lecture format, specifically in a popular music history course. It offers practical insights into how various interactive techniques function in a real-world lecture setting, moving beyond theoretical discussions to provide empirical data on their perceived benefits for knowledge acquisition and communication. The findings challenge some assumptions about group work in lectures and highlight the importance of student expectations and assessment formats in shaping learning experiences. This research provides a basis for educators to more strategically integrate interactive elements into their lectures, aiming to enhance engagement and deeper understanding, rather than merely using them for "loosening up" the session.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: , die hochschullehre, wbv Publikation,
DOI: 10.3278/hsl1605w.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







