What is it about?

This article investigates a common issue called "spin" in physiotherapy research, where authors might present less significant results as more positive than they actually are. The study looks specifically at research conducted by physiotherapists in India from 2000 to 2018. The results show that a significant number of these studies exhibit spin, especially in the summaries and main conclusions. The authors suggest that improving research knowledge, writing skills, and mentorship could help reduce this misleading practice and improve the quality of physiotherapy research in India.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Understanding and addressing the prevalence of "spin" in physiotherapy research is crucial for several reasons. First, accurate reporting of research findings is fundamental for advancing scientific knowledge and informing evidence-based practices in healthcare. If study results are misrepresented, it can lead to misguided clinical decisions and potentially harm patients. Second, the credibility of physiotherapy research is at stake. Misleading interpretations can undermine the trustworthiness of research findings, affecting the reputation of the field and hindering its progress. Moreover, the study's focus on physiotherapy research in India highlights a specific context where research expertise and mentorship may be lacking. Addressing spin in this setting is essential for fostering high-quality research and ensuring that physiotherapists can contribute effectively to global scientific knowledge. Ultimately, by raising awareness about the prevalence of spin and advocating for transparent reporting, the study aims to improve the overall integrity and reliability of physiotherapy research, benefiting both healthcare practitioners and the patients they serve.


It's intriguing to see this study shed light on the prevalence of "spin" in physiotherapy research, particularly in the works of Indian physiotherapists. On the positive side, it's an opportunity for introspection and improvement within the research community. Recognizing the issue is the first step toward enhancing the quality of research. The call for improved research knowledge, better scientific writing skills, and mentorship is a positive step forward. It signals a potential shift towards more robust research practices, ensuring that physiotherapy studies contribute meaningfully to global scientific knowledge. However, the findings also raise concerns about the current state of research integrity and transparency in the field. The high percentage of studies exhibiting spin, especially in conclusions and abstracts, suggests a pressing need for immediate attention. This situation may impact not only the credibility of research but also the trust that practitioners and the public place in physiotherapy findings. In essence, while there's room for improvement and positive change, the study underscores the challenges faced by researchers, particularly in regions with limited resources. It's a nuanced scenario that calls for a balanced approach, acknowledging the progress that can be made while addressing the existing shortcomings in the current state of physiotherapy research.

Naveen Kumar I
Sri Devaraj Urs University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Misreporting study results in main texts and abstracts of randomized controlled trials published by physical therapy researchers (SPIN), Physiotherapy Practice and Research, December 2023, IOS Press,
DOI: 10.3233/ppr-230747.
You can read the full text:



The following have contributed to this page