What is it about?
Yaser Ajeel AL-Nashmi's aims in this article is to explore the scientific reasons for the differences between scholars in the Maliki school of thought and the effect of such differences on their research. The usual method for such investigations is to examine the reasons for the differences between various doctrines and to describe the benefits of each of the various readings of the same doctrine that stem from the different views of the elaborators. In all such efforts, it is important to be objective in order to reach the right conclusion.
Featured Image
Photo by Adli Wahid on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This article is the first scholarly research dealing with the scientific reasons for differences among Maliki doctrine scholars and the impact these differences have on jurisprudence provisions.
Perspectives
There are numerous reasons for the differences within the Maliki school of thought, including differences between the principles and rules of jurisprudence and in linguistic connotations. A single word may have more than one connotation within Arabic.
Prof Abdallah El Khatib EiC Journal of college of Sharia and Islamic Studies A. Qatar University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: أسباب الخلاف في المذهب المالكي من خلال "عقد الجواهر الثمينة" لابن شاس, Journal of College of Sharia & Islamic Studies, June 2021, Qatar University,
DOI: 10.29117/jcsis.2021.0288.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
