What is it about?

Two hundred and thirty two (232) papers were identified using the search strategy. From these identified papers, thirty (30) were included in the final review. Thematic analysis identified three major themes. These included: (i) advantages of using midline catheters (ii) disadvantages of using midline catheters (iii) insertion and management issues.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Midline catheters have both positive and negative implications for clinical practice. They can be used for extended periods of intravenous therapy without requiring repeated cannulations but are not without risk. Midline catheters have been associated with mechanical and chemical phlebitis along with intravascular thrombosis. As such they are not suitable across the entire adult acute population. Midline catheters reduce the number of repeated cannulations which reduces patient discomfort, increases patient satisfaction and also contributes to organisational efficiency.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The Use of Midline Catheters in the Adult Acute Care Setting – Clinical Implications and Recommendations for Practice, Journal of the Association for Vascular Access, January 2011, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.2309/java.16-1-5.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page