What is it about?
The appearance of new approaches is continuously observed in the system of education as a response to the request of abnormal social fluctuations such as a pandemic lockdown, climate change, disaster cases, social distraction during the war, migration and etc. There are many pros and cons in these practically remote learning methods that are underlined by a lot of people working in the sphere of education. Education is the most important part of society that ensures the well-being of humanity and the development of all other infrastructures. The article discusses and reviews the difference and preferences between remote digital methods and the results of applying that learning delivered in our organization during COVID-19 restrictions and currently.
Featured Image
Photo by Susan Q Yin on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The article reviews the education models of learning and shares the experience of remote learning in our University. The aim is to outline the difference between hybrid, blended, and hyperflex approaches, which one works best and in which situation, the strong and weak points, and the new technologies that are applied.
Perspectives
The pandemic ended, and the results are well-developed e-materials inserted on online platforms that allow remote online teaching and assessments. The e-management of education passes its exams and reveals the comfortable way of education delivery, and gives new experiences. The assessment of students transforms 100% online, during session exams, colluviums, self-assessments, scheduling programs, etc. Digitalization entered traditional education and the old approaches and training will never be the same.
Professor Snezhana Boycheva Dineva
Trakian University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Hybrid, Blended, and Hyflex Learning as Future Models for Education, SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2023, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4463580.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
