What is it about?

This paper examines the application of the alternative remedy rule by Nigerian courts especially the Supreme Court. The paper compares the Nigerian practice with the English courts’ practice. The paper finds that Nigerian courts have not been consistent and that the application of the alternative remedy rule by Nigerian courts obstructs access to justice. The paper therefore calls for a rethinking of the alternative remedy rule in Nigeria and also offers a way of resolving the mass of conflicting decisions already produced by the Supreme Court on the matter.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The paper is important because it deals with access to justice in Nigeria particularly in Nigeria's public law.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Rethinking the alternative remedy rule in Nigeria, International Journal of Public Law and Policy, January 2015, Inderscience Publishers,
DOI: 10.1504/ijplap.2015.067778.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page