What is it about?

This article explores the relevance of Carl Rogers’ person-centered approach (PCA) to rehabilitation counseling. His major theoretical exposition concerning the primacy of the client’s actualizing tendency and the six ‘core conditions’ of the counselor-client relationship deserves greater recognition in vocational rehabilitation. The most widely known and researched ‘core conditions’ focus upon the proverbial triad: congruence (genuineness), unconditional positive regard (acceptance) and empathy. How rehabilitation counselors may profitably utilize all six ‘core conditions’ will be discussed with emphasis placed on recent person-centered perspectives that have refined Rogers’ original theory, and that are important to rehabilitation counseling. Evidenced-based research concerning the impact of PCA oriented rehabilitation counseling is lacking. It is argued that the efficacy of PCA can be extrapolated from meta-analyses in other fields of psychotherapy and education. Therefore, it is recommended that rehabilitation counselors apply, and researchers evaluate, PCA in rehabilitation service delivery.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Shows that person-centered approach is relevant to rehabilitation services often dominated medical and directive therapies.

Perspectives

Person-centered approach (PCA) promotes clients as co-managers in the planning, implementation and evaluation of their rehabilitation program. The client’s capacity for self-healing and self-righting generates constructive change: clients are active agents, and counselors often act as support systems rather than expert guides or interventionists. While evidence-based rehabilitation research has not always identified the counselor-client relationship as a key variable, PCA has received strong support from evidence-based research in other fields of counseling and education.

Dr Ross Crisp

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Person-Centred Rehabilitation Counselling: Revisiting the Legacy of Carl Rogers, Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, June 2011, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1375/jrc.17.1.26.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page