Publication not explained

This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.

If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Inter-rater reliability of categorical versus continuous scoring of fish vitality: Does it affect the utility of the reflex action mortality predictor (RAMP) approach?, PLOS One, July 2017, PLOS,
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179092.
You can read the full text:

Read
Open access logo

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page