What is it about?
Many young adults support blood donation, yet blood supplies in Nepal remain insufficient. We surveyed 191 first-year engineering students at Pulchowk Engineering Campus to understand what they know, how they feel, and whether they actually give blood. The results show that while most students hold strongly positive attitudes toward blood donation, only 17% had ever donated; common barriers were “no specific reason” and “lack of opportunity.” Older students and men were more likely to have donated, whereas female students scored higher on knowledge tests but donated less in practice — a “knowledge–practice gap.” Our findings suggest campus-level solutions such as regular on-site donation drives, peer advocacy clubs, and symbolic recognition (non-monetary incentives) to convert strong willingness into action. Key takeaways (3 bullets) Strong support, low practice: 97% of students reported positive attitudes, but only 16.8% had donated blood. Main barriers were opportunity and uncertainty: 34.6% said lack of opportunity and 42.8% gave “no specific reason.” Practical fix: regular on-campus blood drives and student-led mobilization could rapidly increase donations from this willing population.
Featured Image
Photo by Carlos Magno on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Improving on-campus donation opportunities could quickly expand Nepal’s voluntary donor pool and reduce shortages that delay emergency treatment. Targeted, low-cost actions (campus drives, peer organizers, and light recognition) are likely to be effective given the high existing willingness.
Perspectives
As a public health researcher, I was encouraged by the strong pro-donation attitudes and believe that simple, low-cost campus mobilization (regular blood drives and peer outreach) can rapidly increase voluntary donations among students.
Bhola Teli
BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Knowledge, attitude, and practice on blood donation among undergraduate first-year engineering students in Nepal, PLOS One, May 2026, PLOS,
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349219.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







