What is it about?
This article highlights the importance of Scientific Initiation (SI) for students and researchers, innovating by exploring researchers' perspectives. The study aims to outline the planning for a systematic review to identify factors influencing the work of these researchers, their motivations, and resulting impacts.
Featured Image
Photo by Lucas Vasques on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Innovating in investigating researchers' perspectives on Scientific Initiation (SI). The proposed systematic review can inform institutional strategies to enhance SI programs, encouraging more effective researcher participation and strengthening students' scientific training.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Factors influencing the work of researchers in Scientific Initiation: A systematic review protocol, PLoS ONE, January 2024, PLOS,
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297186.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Pre-registration of the systematic review protocol on the OSF Registers platform
Pre-registration of the systematic review protocol on the OSF Registers platform
Keywords included in the search strategy are organized in blocks
Keywords included in the search strategy are organized in blocks.
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for the identification, screening, and inclusion of studies in the review
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for the identification, screening, and inclusion of studies in the review
Details of the Boolean search string for each database
Details of the Boolean search string for each database
The PRISMA-P checklist for this systematic review protocol
The PRISMA-P checklist for this systematic review protocol
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page