What is it about?
We conducted a research study where we collected over 200 clinical questions from family doctors. We then searched for answers to those questions using different types of clinical websites known to have reliable scientific information. We began our research by using clinical summaries, which are websites that give a short version of information that comes from other sources, that has already been checked by experts, and is therefore quick and easy to interpret. If we couldn't find an answer, we then searched on other sources that had more detailed information but were harder to interpret. We were able to find answers to over 90% of the doctors’ questions. Most of the answers we found came from the three selected clinical summaries websites (BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, and DynaMed), with a median search time of only 4 minutes.
Featured Image
Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Doctors have many questions when treating patients, but they only look for answers to some of these questions. And when they do, they do not always use evidence-based, reliable resources. We found that barriers perceived by doctors which hinder evidence-based practice include insufficient time, and doubt that the search would yield an answer. Our study addressed this concern and found that most of the answers to family doctors’ clinical questions can be found in clinical summaries. We hope these results will encourage doctors to increase the use of clinical summaries, and alert decision makers of the importance of easy access to these kinds of resources by health professionals, which is still irregular in many countries in Europe.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study, PLoS ONE, November 2022, PLOS,
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277462.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page