What is it about?
This study looks at what people in Grenada know, believe, and do about rabies, a deadly disease that can spread from animals to humans. Although Grenada has had no human rabies cases since 1970, many households still own animals that can carry the disease. Researchers visited nearly 1,000 homes and asked animal owners about rabies knowledge, vaccination habits, and their views on government control programs. Most people had heard of rabies, but many did not fully understand which animals can spread it, how long vaccines protect animals, or the signs of rabies in animals. Vaccination rates were especially low for livestock. People said lack of information, long wait times, and difficulty getting animals to clinics were major barriers. The findings show that better public education and easier access to vaccination are important to help Grenada maintain its success in preventing human rabies cases.
Featured Image
Photo by Arun Narayanan on Unsplash
Why is it important?
What makes this study unique is that it is the first national, population-based assessment of how everyday animal owners in Grenada understand and engage with rabies prevention in a country that has successfully avoided human rabies cases for over 50 years. Rather than focusing only on animal surveillance or laboratory data, the study reveals the human behaviors and system gaps that quietly threaten this success—such as low vaccination coverage in livestock, limited awareness of government rabies programs beyond vaccination, and misunderstandings about which animals can carry rabies and how long vaccines protect them. By identifying practical barriers like poor access, time constraints, and information gaps, the findings move beyond theory to highlight actionable opportunities for strengthening prevention. This research matters because it shows that maintaining a zero-human-rabies status is not automatic; it depends on sustained education, trust, and service delivery. The study offers a valuable template for other Caribbean and small-island settings facing similar risks, making it relevant not only locally but regionally and globally.
Perspectives
From a personal perspective, this study clearly demonstrates the power of national, population-based assessments to uncover the real-world factors that determine whether public health programs succeed or quietly weaken over time. Grenada’s long-standing zero-human-rabies status might suggest that existing control measures are fully effective, yet these findings reveal important gaps in knowledge, vaccination practices, and public awareness that would not be visible through routine surveillance alone. By listening directly to animal owners across the country, the study shows governments where prevention efforts are breaking down—whether through limited access to vaccination services, misunderstandings about rabies risk, or lack of awareness of complementary control programs. This type of evidence allows policymakers to move from assumptions to targeted action, refining education campaigns, improving service delivery, and allocating resources where they will have the greatest impact. In doing so, national assessments like this one become an essential early-warning system, helping countries protect past public health gains and prevent the re-emergence of rabies before human cases occur again.
Dr. Martin S Forde
St. George's University, Grenada
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding rabies in Grenada, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, January 2019, PLOS,
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007079.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
