What is it about?

Explains that the argument that there are indefinitely many confounding factors does not invalidate randomization.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

There are infinitely many terms in the series 1/2 +1/4 +1/8.... but this does not mean that the sum does not converge. Similarly, although there may be indefinitely many factors affecting outcome in a clinical trial, the sum of their effects may be bounded. Once this is understood, it is seen that the indefinitely many factor argument is a red-herring

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: A Brief Note Regarding Randomization, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, January 2013, Project Muse,
DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2013.0024.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page