What is it about?
This article looks at the challenges of teaching the Mental Health Act 1983, a law that is still used every day in mental health services but is widely seen as outdated. The paper explains how the Act gives a lot of power to psychiatrists, limits patient choice, and does not properly protect people from coercion or discrimination. It also highlights serious gaps in the law, such as limited access to advocacy, no clear way for people to record their treatment preferences, and a lack of safeguards for children and young people. The article shows how these issues affect nursing practice, especially for people from racial and ethnic minority groups who are more likely to be detained under the Act. It argues that nurse educators must help students understand both the legal rules and the ethical challenges, encouraging them to think critically, reflect on inequalities and advocate for patients’ rights even within a flawed system.
Featured Image
Photo by Dom Fou on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This article is important because it explains the real tension nurses face: they must follow a law that is essential to practice, but that same law can limit autonomy, cause harm and reinforce inequalities. It highlights why relying on the legislation alone is not enough, nurses need to understand the wider human impact of detention, coercion and discrimination. The piece is unique because it doesn’t only critique the law; it connects legal shortcomings directly to the realities of nurse education. It shows how teaching the Mental Health Act requires more than explaining rules, it involves helping students build ethical awareness, cultural sensitivity, advocacy skills and the confidence to challenge unfair practice. The article also stands out for addressing racial disparities and for showing how educators can use critical reflection, case studies and lived‑experience narratives to bridge the gap between outdated legislation and modern, person‑centred mental health care
Perspectives
I’m genuinely proud to have this article published because it speaks to an issue that has shaped much of my work as a mental health nurse and lecturer. Throughout my career, I’ve seen how the Mental Health Act can both protect and disempower people, and I’ve supported many students who struggle to understand the ethical challenges it creates. Writing this paper gave me the opportunity to reflect on those experiences and to highlight why nurse education must go beyond simply teaching the law. As someone committed to compassionate, rights‑based care, I believe it is crucial that we prepare future nurses to think critically, recognise injustice and advocate for patients, even when working within an outdated legal framework. This is something I care deeply about, and I am proud to contribute to this important conversation in our profession.
Allen O'Connor
Edge Hill University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Teaching an outdated framework: navigating the Mental Health Act 1983 in nurse education, British Journal of Mental Health Nursing, February 2026, Mark Allen Group,
DOI: 10.12968/bjmh.2025.0051.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
