What is it about?

To shed light on the complex problem of the poor responder patient undergoing ART, the POSEIDON Group -created in 2015 under the initiative of Prof. Alviggi from Italy- discussed and elaborated practical solutions concerning the diagnosis and management of the poor responder patient undergoing ART.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

You should care about the new Poseidon criteria because they propose a unique and more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation, which represents a significant proportion of patients we treat in our daily practice.

Perspectives

The POSEIDON group proposes a change in the definition of POR from heterogeneous criteria to the concept of low prognosis, which may better reflect the fate of these patients in ART. The POSEIDON criteria combine oocyte quality and quantity for the stratification of patients with a confirmed or an expected inappropriate ovarian response, and allow clinicians to estimate the number of oocytes needed to achieve a new marker of success, i.e., at least ONE euploid embryo for transfer in each patient. Using Poseidon, the clinician can classify their patients with a low prognosis in ART properly and estimate the number of oocytes needed to obtain at least one euploid blastocyst for transfer in each patient. Then, the doctor can design an individualized therapeutic plan with the mindset to achieve the target number of oocytes to most optimally manage the patient’s clinical scenario. The new concept of low prognosis helps to improve the management of patients undergoing ART, promotes a tailored approach to patient handling, and identifies more homogeneous populations for clinical trials, thereby providing better tools with which to maximize IVF success rates.

Dr Sandro C Esteves
Androfert - Centro de Referência de Reprodução Masculina

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The novel POSEIDON stratification of ‘Low prognosis patients in Assisted Reproductive Technology’ and its proposed marker of successful outcome, F1000Research, December 2016, Faculty of 1000, Ltd.,
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.10382.1.
You can read the full text:

Read
Open access logo

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page