What is it about?

Hospitals around the world are short of doctors and nurses, and artificial intelligence (AI) is often presented as part of the solution. But new technology only helps if the people using it are ready to work with it. This study asked 266 doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and other health workers at the University of Ghana Medical Centre in Accra what they know about AI, how they feel about it, and whether they would use it in their work. Most rated their own knowledge as only average, very few had any formal training, and many were unfamiliar with how tools like machine learning work. Even so, most were optimistic: nearly three-quarters agreed AI could benefit healthcare, and many said they were willing to work alongside it. Workers who knew more about AI were more positive, more trusting, and more willing to collaborate with it. Early-career staff were the most enthusiastic, and doctors and pharmacists reported knowing more than nurses. Their openness came with conditions. They preferred AI that supports human decisions rather than replaces them, and they worried about ethics, trust, and the lack of training. The authors conclude that training and sensible ethical rules matter as much as the technology itself.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Most research on AI in healthcare comes from wealthy countries, where hospitals have very different resources, infrastructure, and training than those across much of Africa. This study offers rare, on-the-ground evidence from a major hospital in Ghana, drawn from a random sample across clinical departments rather than an online survey that can miss staff with limited digital access. It is timely because health systems are being urged to adopt AI quickly, often before anyone has asked frontline workers whether they feel prepared. The findings point to a gap leaders can act on: enthusiasm is already high, but training is almost absent, and that is where investment will pay off. They also show that health workers want AI as a partner, not a replacement, and that trust, ethics, and local relevance will decide whether tools succeed or stall. For hospital managers, policymakers, educators, and technology developers working in Ghana and similar settings, the study offers a practical starting point for building AI training programs, governance rules, and implementation plans around the people who will actually use the tools every day.

Perspectives

As a management scholar, I see this as a leadership story more than a technology story. Staff here are ready for AI, yet almost none have been trained for it, and that is a gap leaders can close. Successful adoption means investing in people first: building skills, earning trust, and setting ethical guardrails that keep human judgment at the center. Organizations that skip that step will buy powerful tools and wonder why nobody uses them well.

Prof. Robert M Yawson, PhD
Truman State University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Future of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Knowledge, attitudes, and acceptance by healthcare workers in Ghana- A quantitative cross-sectional case study, Digital Health, February 2026, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/20552076261502908.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page