What is it about?

This article examines the process of consensus formation by the international community regarding how to confront the problem of trafficking in persons. We analyze the corpus of United Nations General Assembly Third Committee resolutions to show that: (1) consensus around the issue of how to confront trafficking in persons has increased over time; and (2) the formation of this consensus depends upon how the issue is framed. We test our argument by examining the characteristics of resolutions’ sponsors and discursive framing concepts such as crime, human rights, and the strength of enforcement language. We conclude that the consensus-formation process in international relations is more aptly described as one of ‘accommodation’ through issue linkage than a process of persuasion.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This research has important implications for how states reach consensus on contentious issues in international politics. While much recent research has concentrated on how and why states ratify international agreements, it is important to understand how such agreements become possible in the first place.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Frames and consensus formation in international relations: The case of trafficking in persons, European Journal of International Relations, May 2014, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1354066114530173.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page