What is it about?

The Treatise of the Vessels identifies the gold of the Temple as gold of Parvaim from Eden. The idea that the Temple’s gold came from Eden is otherwise unattested, but it may have come from exegetical reflection on scriptural texts and traditions concerning gold and Eden. (1) The description of gold as “good” is unique to Genesis 2 and 2 Chronicles 3. (2) A chain of scriptural texts could associate the gold of the Temple to Eden through linking Parvaim, Ophir, and Havilah. (3) Traditions concerning golden fruit could have contributed to associating the gold of the Temple with fruit trees in Eden. These intertexts and traditions not only provide examples of the kind of scriptural exegesis that may have been formative in the composition of The Treatise of the Vessels, but also demonstrate similarity more widely attested traditions concerning the gold of Parvaim, the Garden of Eden, and the Temple in the Midrash, Talmud, and Targum Pseudo-Jonathan. Recognizing such similarities may be an initial step in further consideration of the context of the text’s composition.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This article considers how traditions and scriptural exegesis may have contributed to the identification of the gold of the Temple as from Eden in the Treatise of the Vessels, a relatively unresearched text of unknown provenance.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The Treatise of the Vessels (Massekhet Kelim) and traditions concerning Eden and the gold of Parvaim, Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha, March 2020, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0951820720914766.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page