What is it about?
This study explored two Q-matrix specifications with the DINA model in a statewide large-scale mathematics assessment. The first Q-matrix was developed based on five pre-defined content reporting categories, and the second was based on the post-hoc coding of fifteen attributes by test-development experts.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Results show that total raw scores correlated strongly with the number of skills mastered, using both Q-matrices. Correlations between the DINA-model item statistics and those from the item-response-theory analyses were moderate to strong, but were always lower for the 15-skill model. Results highlighted the trade-off between finer-grained modeling and less precise model estimation.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Exploring the Impact of Q-Matrix Specifications Through a DINA Model in a Large-Scale Mathematics Assessment, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, August 2019, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0734282919867535.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







