What is it about?
Both Children’s Literature Studies and Games Studies exist at the margins of traditional Literary Studies. This article argues that since both disciplines have been relegated to the kid’s table, they may as well get to know one another. It encourages interdisciplinary crossover and suggests that the threshold between Children’s Literature Studies and Games Studies may in fact be a particularly strong strategic location from which to challenge hegemonic conceptions of art and literature.
Featured Image
Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash
Why is it important?
‘The child’ and ‘the videogame’ didn’t get off on the right foot. In fact, the corralling of children and gaming has been a serious stumbling block for Games Studies on its journey towards artistic legitimacy and academic credibility. In light of this, it is understandable that games scholars might be reluctant to engage with the figure of ‘the child’; however, in responding defensively to accusations of childishness, games studies actually affirms and reinforces the unfavourable collocation of ‘children’, ‘play’, and ‘low culture’. Instead, this paper encourages games studies to embrace ‘the child’ - to take charge of the narrative of infantilisation and author their own relationship to this powerful cultural symbol.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Kideogames: Reimagining the Fringe of Literary Studies as the Forefront, Games and Culture, April 2019, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1555412019841476.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page