What is it about?

Why so many women still take their husbands name when they marry. Marital surname change is a striking example of the survival of tradition.How has a practice emerging from patriarchal history become embedded in an age of detraditionalisation and women’s emancipation. Is the tradition of women’s marital name change just some sort of inertia or drag, which will slowly disappear as modernity progresses, or does this tradition fulfil more contemporary roles? Are women and men just dupes to tradition, or alternatively do they use tradition to further their aims? We examine how different approaches – individualisation theory, new institutionalism, and bricolage – might tackle these questions. We find that while individualisation and new institutionalism offer partial explanations, bricolage offers a more adaptable viewpoint.This examination is set within a comparative analysis of marital surname change in Britain and Norway,

Featured Image

Why is it important?

We need to re-evaluate the role of tradition in contemporary behaviour. And we need to assess the best way of doing this

Perspectives

The shorter version in Conversation provoked much debate and hostility around the idea of patriarchy

Professor Simon Duncan
University of Bradford

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Understanding Tradition: Marital Name Change in Britain and Norway, Sociological Research Online, December 2019, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1360780419892637.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page