What is it about?
The principle of legal certainty and the process of sentencing should be applied consistently, with the foreseeable legal consequences. This is especially important in regard to punishing international crimes. Moreover, the mentioned process in the Republic of Serbia, has been influenced by political developments at the international level, as well as at the national level. This article particularly examines allegations of leniency, inconsistency and a lack of sufficient reasoning in the analyzed cases.
Featured Image
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The article reveals characteristics of the war crimes sentencing before Serbian courts. The research consists of the analysis of 38 publicly available cases before the War Crimes Department of Higher Court in Belgrade, as well as of the analysis of 57 publicly available cases before the War Crimes Department of Appellate Court in Belgrade. It offers a detailed examination of sentencing practices in different categories of cases, compared by its outcomes, based on the underlying offences; mode of liability; type of protected interests violated by the underlying criminal conduct and the defendant's rank/position.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Punishing International Crimes in Serbia, International Criminal Law Review, January 2019, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15718123-01901003.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page