What is it about?

This is an argument that the academic study of religion is a fundamentally philosophical enterprise and thus that the study of religion could benefit from a closer integration with philosophy, but also that philosophy could benefit from a greater familiarity with and more accurate understanding of the history of religions.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Currently the study of religion is in some disarray with a prominent cadre of scholars arguing that the category "religion" is nothing but a manipulative and self-serving construct of the Western academy. This paper is part of an extended argument that this is not entirely the case, but that religious behavior is a class of behavior that can and must be studied, currently in a discursive and speculative, but rigorous and carefully reasoned (in other words, philosophical) manner. At present there is no adequate paradigm or method to advance the study of religion and clarify our understanding of the category, hence the need for this speculative approach.

Perspectives

Schilbrack's book is important in it's own right, but it is most important as part of a growing realization that the heart of the study of religion is not the analysis and interpretation of texts but a more interrogative and broad-based consideration of the phenomenon of religious behavior. This amounts to a "philosophy of religion." However, the academic discipline that currently practices under the title "philosophy of religion" is in fact a philosophical theology focused almost exclusively on problems of Christian doctrine. A more accurately named philosophy of religion would surpass these tradition-specific restrictions and provide a central (but not singular) methodology for the study of religion. This essay is part of a series beginning with "Myths, Models, and Metaphors" in 2009 and including "After This Strange Starting .." in 2010.

Professor Bryan S. Rennie
Westminster College

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Can Philosophy Save the Study of Religion?, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, December 2016, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341358.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page