This shareable PDF can be hosted on any platform or network and is fully compliant with publisher copyright.
I examine why Aristotle thinks that bodily organs and processes are too limited to fully account for the range of things we are able to understand.
This page is a summary of: Why the Intellect Cannot Have a Bodily Organ: De Anima 3.4, Phronesis, January 2013, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15685284-12341253.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page
Journal of Moral Philosophy
When we give consent, e.g. to a tattoo or medical procedure, we generate a permission for others. Yet, consent normally requires the absence of coercion. In this paper, I analyse the relation betwe...
Journal of Social Policy
The Munro Review of Child Protection asserted that the English child protection system had become overly ‘defensive’, ‘bureaucratised’ and ‘standardised’, meaning that social workers were not emplo...
Simone de Beauvoir Studies
Two crises of our age, refugee statelessness and sexual violence, converge in the lives of refugee women. I examine this convergence by analyzing the meanings of refugee camp sexual aggression and ...
