What is it about?
Scholarly evidence on the causes of state-run unemployment insurance development is sometimes contradictory and disconnected, preventing our understanding of union-run unemployment insurance development. I argue that a set-theoretic approach based on Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) can model the business-labor interaction in the development of union unemployment funds. I revealed two causal paths by comparing 11 sectors in 20th-century France. In skill-intensive, low-risk firms, union funds developed only when unionization rates were low. In small, low-risk factories, funds developed regardless of workers’ wages. The sociability fostered by small unions and factories allowed for social control, reducing psychological barriers to insurance scheme establishment. By comparing the business-labor combinations in different industries, this study demonstrates the “variety of unionism” hidden beneath the existing macro cross-national evidence. I feel that the results have the potential to stimulate a fruitful debate about the appropriateness of the set-theoretic approach to welfare state development and the causal complexity of this research area.
Featured Image
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Recent reexaminations of worker involvement in expanding the welfare programs have not sufficiently related variations in trade unionism to variations in business preferences. A set-theoretic approach may be more successful in explaining varieties of business-union combinations. By applying QCA to meet this requirement, this article provided some avenues for future research.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Varieties of Unionism?, Comparative Sociology, April 2023, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15691330-bja10078.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page