What is it about?

We study the impact of communication on behavior in a two-stage coordination game with asymmetric payoffs. We test experimentally whether individuals can avoid a head-to-head confrontation by means of coordinated strategies. In particular we analyze whether and how quickly a conflict-avoidance take turn strategy can emerge. First, our results show that players learn to solve the conflict by choosing opposite options at both stages of the game. Second, many adopt a take turn strategy to sustain coordination over time and alleviate the inequality induced by the asymmetry of payoffs. Third, communication increases the likelihood of conflict resolution regardless of whether communication is unilateral or bilateral.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION IN A TWO-STAGE GAME, Economic Inquiry, March 2016, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12325.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page