What is it about?
This is a conceptual article that uses the concept “boundary object” in order to discuss what role the loosely defined notion “standard product quality” plays with regard to coordination and controversies in the Norwegian agrifood market. The Boundary object theory offers a unique approach to exploring the boundaries (shared spaces) between standard and non-standard product qualities as framed by the involved actors. This theory emphasises the difference between doing and being: Analysing what quality does in social settings is a more informative approach than discussing what quality is. The core arguments are illustrated by a review of available studies of the Norwegian agrifood market. The first part of the article concludes that standard quality coordinates the hegemonic stakeholders (producers, retailers, regulators and consumers) without presupposing consensus between them. The second part of the article addresses the controversies in the boundaries between the hegemonic agricultural agrifood system and competing alternatives related to organic, terroir and animal welfare-qualities. The study discerns no signs of any transformative quality-turn away from the Norwegian hegemonic agrifood system and the inherent emphasise on “standard product” quality. On the other hand, this is not static since different interpretations of quality continuously challenge each other.
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Boundary object theory reminds us that organisations are not only bundles of capabilities but also bundles of dynamic boundaries. The article further illustrates how power issues can be explicitly incorporated into the analysis of boundary objects and subsequently into theories of organisational boundary spanning organisations. Shared spaces are arenas and loci where controversies unfold. Organisational boundaries are commonly conceptualised in terms of economic efficiency. But organisational boundaries also need to be investigated from perspectives such as identity, learning and power distribution. Boundary object theory is clearly useful in that respect. Boundary objects are never neutral. They are embedded within complicated networks of social relations. Their function is very much a product of their location within these networks.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Standard quality as a boundary object—A conceptual study, Sociologia Ruralis, July 2021, Wiley, DOI: 10.1111/soru.12345.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page